|  |
|
| |
By: Da Sissop
Date: 11/19/99 9:32:40 PM
# Replies: 42
Okay, I went ahead and rated my web site with the Recreational Software Advisory Council on the Internet, because, dammit, I want to do my part to ensure a safe, family-friendly browsing experience.
I had to rate this site in four categories:
Violence - 0 (None of the above or sports related)
Nudity - 0 (None of the above)
Sex - 0 (None of the above or innocent kissing; romance)
Language - 4 (Crude, vulgar language or extreme hate speech)
So, any kids that make it through the front door are somebody else's responsibility. Little bastards shouldn't even be here anyway. I say we KILL THEM ALL!!! KILL THE NO GOOD LITTLE KID BASTARDS!!1!! Growin' up and taking away our JOBS....
Response #1
By: Roxanne
Date: 11/20/99 11:41:04 PM
Um, what if I tell you that I always post naked? Do you have to change the "nudity" score?
Response #2
By: Da Sissop
Date: 11/21/99 10:30:20 AM
Naw, client-side nudity is beyond my control.
Response #3
By: Gowan McGland
Date: 11/21/99 4:19:50 PM
Wasn't there a nude picture of Courtney Love posted at some point?
We talk about violence a lot, does that matter?
Response #4
By: Da Sissop
Date: 11/21/99 5:42:37 PM
Well I figure all that other stuff is so rare as to be inconsequential. Besides, if any parents have wired their kids' browsers into the rating system, I think my maxxing out the scale in "crude vulgar language or extreme hate speech" should keep 'em out.
Response #5
By: Roxanne
Date: 11/22/99 12:02:55 AM
Fangeroo: You could put up one of those "no shirt, no shoes, no pants, no service" signs.
I'll try to remember to put on clothes when I post. But my webcam sites gets so many more hits when I'm nekkid. :)
Response #6
By: Ralf
Date: 11/22/99 7:34:35 AM
"No pants"?
That's hitting below the belt.
Response #7
By: Ralf
Date: 9/8/00 3:13:17 PM
"below the belt".
Heh.
Response #8
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 9/9/00 12:56:15 AM
Nekkid posting is proof that we're really time travellers from the future.
Response #9
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/9/00 4:22:19 PM
I thought nekkid posting was proof that porn actually exists on the internet and is NOT a communist plot?
Response #10
By: Roxanne
Date: 9/10/00 9:13:36 PM
How can you "hit below the belt" someone who is pantsless?
Ralf, dear, you are a conundrum circled by an enigma concealed with a mystery and wrapped up in a warm cheesy pita!
Response #11
By: sooz
Date: 9/10/00 9:19:48 PM
And cute, to boot!
Response #12
By: Ralf
Date: 9/11/00 6:34:23 AM
Wow! I've never been compared to a warm cheesy pita before AND called cute within the same thread.
Thanks for making my morning!
Response #13
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/11/00 10:47:30 AM
Sniff!
Kinda makes you all misty doesn't it?
Response #14
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 9/11/00 2:59:55 PM
Yea it does...makes me feel all warm inside. It's a Pop'n Fresh moment(tm). Hey Cap, you gotta nother tissue?
-sniff-
Response #15
By: Roxanne
Date: 9/11/00 9:14:17 PM
Zane, go to zthing.com and check out the "Failed Breakfast Cereals" clip.
Response #16
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 9/12/00 7:33:52 AM
Rox:
Ya know, there are times when I really am ashamed at what I laugh at...this is one of them. Those are *too* funny!
Response #17
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/12/00 7:54:47 PM
Freah box right here.
Gee, no one ever invites me to check out things. I'm jealous. Ralf, gets told his cute, Zane gets invited. Me? Chopped Liver! :(
Response #18
By: Roxanne
Date: 9/12/00 8:39:52 PM
Here ya go, Spaz
http://www.whowouldyoukill.com/
Response #19
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/13/00 9:31:41 AM
What the hell was that?
Freah box right here. ???????
I don't remember typing anything that absurd last night.
Are you sure this web site isn't haunted?
Response #20
By: Da Sissop
Date: 9/13/00 10:44:55 AM
Might be, but it's more likely that while you were on the BBS you were also in an IRC room where they were talking about freah boxes, and you meant to type "Yaaaah, (yank yank) I got yer freah box right here" to the chat room, but you switched tasks back to the BBS in the midst of it.
Response #21
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/16/00 6:23:15 AM
IRC...ahh, those were the days!
I need to install an IRC program. He-he. What's it like in IRC these days?
Response #22
By: Gowan McGland
Date: 9/16/00 10:02:37 AM
100,000 channels and nothing's on.
Response #23
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/18/00 12:14:45 PM
So it's just like cable now?
Response #24
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 9/18/00 12:29:15 PM
No, I think that what Gowan's getting at is that
BY AND LARGE, PEOPLE ARE STUPID.
Response #25
By: Ralf
Date: 9/18/00 1:17:07 PM
Senseless yammering
On the IRC tonight
Aieee, make it stop
Response #26
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/18/00 10:01:09 PM
Would that be ALL people Homer or just Aggies?
Response #27
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 9/19/00 7:03:23 PM
All. Especially me.
Response #28
By: Ralf
Date: 9/20/00 7:12:31 AM
Oh, you're not stupid.
In fact, I take exception to the idea that "all people are stupid". Some people are genuinely stupid, but most people are just tired. Fatigue robs you of IQ points faster than beer, and we're a chronically fatigued society.
However, I support the notion that most people are ignorant. Thank goodness ignorance is curable, whereas stupidity is not.
Response #29
By: Da Sissop
Date: 9/20/00 6:02:09 PM
From a distance, all people are stupid.
Response #30
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/20/00 8:24:56 PM
I thought that from a distance, all things were smaller than they actually appear?
Response #31
By: Da Sissop
Date: 9/21/00 6:27:01 AM
Nono, you're thinking of car mirrors, and objects being closer than they appear.
Which leads me to wonder, if we had a big enough car mirror, could we maybe see all the way back to the Big Bang?
Response #32
By: Roxanne
Date: 9/21/00 7:40:58 AM
Possibly, but I'd be worried what would happen if a mirror that big got broken. If a regular mirror breaking causes seven years bad luck...
Response #33
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/22/00 6:46:38 AM
Closer, smaller, such a fine line.
Response #34
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 9/22/00 2:26:00 PM
Posing does have it's moments of rationalization.
Response #35
By: Ralf
Date: 9/23/00 7:00:31 AM
Rationalization does have its moments of posing.
Response #36
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/25/00 8:46:08 AM
Posing rationalizations has it's moments of extreme limber.
Response #37
By: Ralf
Date: 9/25/00 9:22:06 AM
Posing limburger cheese cannot be rationalized.
Response #38
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 9/26/00 9:07:31 PM
Rationalizing posing cheese does have it's moments of extreme Swiss.
Response #39
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/26/00 10:05:42 PM
The Swiss have been posing rationalizations in compromising positions since 1945.
Response #40
By: Ralf
Date: 9/27/00 6:07:47 AM
You say they've been rationing swiss cheese since 1945?
Response #41
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 9/27/00 8:43:25 AM
Yea, but that was immediately following the Great Cabbage Fart Panic of 1943.
Response #42
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 9/27/00 9:32:10 PM
Yes.
How could you forget the great cheese embargo of he `70's?
That Nixon bastard!!
It was all his fault.