|  |
|
| |
By: Ralf
Date: 12/1/97 6:45:34 PM
# Replies: 106
Great start!
Here's a thread to discuss suggestions and/or bugs. Like, which bugs the software SHOULD have.
Lessee.. I think that clicking on the user's handle should not immediately send email to that user. It oughta display a personal stats page, so I can tell if that user is a k-rad foxx and THEN there should be a link to send that person email. (That page is also where the optional photo-ID is too, so you can tell if the fox is PHAT or fat...)
Oh, you should use the email address provided at the login to send the board-generated password to the user, then let them login with it and CHANGE it online. Better security.
Dammit, what's my problem?! I'm just bitchin!
Ralf
Response #1
By: Momma Bear
Date: 1/30/98 4:42:56 PM
OHMYGOD! I'm stunned! Only Fang could do this!!
It's me! Is it really all of you? Fang? Homer-my-sweet? Tess? Cleotis? Rorschach...now THAT's a name I'll never forget! And Gowan who left the breadcrumbs for me to follow! Hugs all around! I'm just so happy to see all of you again.
Just think....all of this for only the low, low price of $19.95 a month....unlimited usage! Too Cool!
xoxoxo Fang....I think of you, sweetie, every time I see my gallstone and guess what? I got my uterus in a jar now!!! muhahahaha...
Response #2
By: sooz
Date: 1/30/98 11:08:15 PM
Hi, MB! You probably don't remember me, but I was a big ol' fan o' yours. :-)
Good to see you 'round here.
Response #3
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 1/31/98 3:51:43 PM
MommaBear! Woo!!
Now all we need is JJ Hitt to troll... :-)
Response #4
By: Da Sissop
Date: 1/31/98 5:41:55 PM
Wooo MB! Wunnerful to seeya agin!
Response #5
By: rorschach
Date: 2/2/98 8:06:49 AM
Howdy MB! Hows da cubs?
Response #6
By: Momma Bear
Date: 2/6/98 10:43:46 PM
Hi again... Rorschach, the cubs are fine and dandy, thanks for asking. The youngest one, AKA Lulu, is in Vegas right now. It's her first trip. I made *my* first trip there last June (I think) and had a good time losing money! Sooz, certainly I remember you! How 'ya been doing? What's new with you? Well I been out surfing this evening....a rare occurrance for me, I usually go online during the day and left the nights to the horny thundering AOL hoards. Homer, my sweet, I'll get in touch with JJ and sent him on over! He's at jjhitt@swbell.net. It's great to be together again! Take care all...... -edie, the artist formerly known as mb
Response #7
By: jjhitt
Date: 2/7/98 10:38:33 AM
Homah sez:
}} Now all we need is JJ Hitt to troll... :-)
Say whut?
Response #8
By: sooz
Date: 2/7/98 11:42:40 AM
Hey! He's here!
Groovy. Let's roll.
Response #9
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 2/7/98 7:23:29 PM
JJ.
You FREAK.
:-)
Response #10
By: jjhitt
Date: 2/8/98 12:58:08 AM
Yeah... I'm still alive, sober and obnoxious.
Only marginally employed though... I'm currently working the graveyard shift for an ISP run by a bunch of Mmmm...
M...Mo...Mo...
Mo..MOR...MOR
MORMONS!!!
[[ sound effect: Daffy Duck going apeshit ]]
And I thought it didn't really fit in at the last place I worked.
Response #11
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/8/98 2:16:00 AM
[[ sound effect: Daffy Duck going apeshit ]]
(Gotta love this crazy new technology!)
Hearty hallo JJ! Long time no see!
Response #12
By: sooz
Date: 2/8/98 12:32:30 PM
Fang, you amaze me.
JJ, I hear ya. I don't fit in where I work, either. On problem is I'm self-employed.
Response #13
By: Tess Trueheart
Date: 2/8/98 7:53:30 PM
Welcome JJ.. nice to read you again
Response #14
By: rorschach
Date: 2/8/98 7:57:49 PM
Ya know, its a good thing I reread jj's post... I almost thought something COMPLETELY different about jj's employers..... I think I need new glasses, either that or maybe I need to petition fang for bigger type....
Response #15
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 2/9/98 1:00:16 AM
Ror*, your browser probably has a way to set your own preference for default type-size and style.
--Homer, Mr. Documentation
Response #16
By: rorschach
Date: 2/9/98 8:49:59 AM
AH! but you see, I'm also too damned lazy!
Response #17
By: sooz
Date: 2/9/98 5:47:13 PM
Our high school cheer, adapted: L-A-Z-Y, you ain't got no alibi, You Lazy! Yeah, yeah, you LAZY!
Response #18
By: jjhitt
Date: 2/10/98 1:14:25 AM
> Welcome JJ.. nice to read you again
Ah yes.. I remember you. You're the real estate lady with the eye level breasts.
Response #19
By: Jay
Date: 2/11/98 10:07:58 AM
I spent years developing my breast level eyes
Response #20
By: jjhitt
Date: 2/12/98 1:54:10 AM
There are times when I am reminded that there are some nice things about being short.
Response #21
By: rorschach
Date: 2/12/98 8:57:41 AM
speaking of "shortcomings"... back to the original thread. heres a problem that I am not certain has a solution but I'll bitch about it anyway and maybe somebody'll have a brilliant idea, or at least somebody can say yeah that really bites.... The phone lines where I work, SUCK bigtime and not only are they VERY slow, they drop carrier on me alot too. when this happens while I'm in the middle of a read new/read all, the system forces me to re-login to nuns because it either thinks i'm still logged in (but it is not responding as if i am) and wants to verify that two people aren't logging into the same accout at the same time, or it has just plain forgot who the hell I am. either way, i have to do the old LD dance and start my RN/RA all over again. any ideas?
Response #22
By: Roach
Date: 2/12/98 6:22:50 PM
i think the matchmaker is rigged.
Response #23
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/12/98 6:45:19 PM
Hmmm. Lemme take a look in the Troubleshooting Guide. Hold on a sec. Ah yes, here it is.
PROBLEM: The Board forgets who I am whenever I drop carrier. It never used to do that in the *old* days. What gives?
SOLUTION: Read faster.
ALTERNATE SOLUTION: I suppose I *could* try designating ya as a "WackyIP" user and see if that helps. Basically, that grants ya a little more leeway in the security, in that it only compares the first three chunks of your IP address instead of your entire IP address. If your IP address assignments don't vary too wildly when you reconnect it could help a bit. But the tradeoff is that there's a slightly greater risk that someone else with the same first three chunks of an IP address who specifically wanted to hack your Nunnery account and post messages as you could do so by guessing the random character part of your security key, constructing the proper URL, and doing so within an hour of your last activity on the board.
You make the call. But bear in mind I am considering putting a hypertext link to users' credit reports in the User Profiles.
Response #24
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/12/98 8:36:20 PM
And hey! Look! It's Grin, disguised as "Roach!"
Hiya Grin! (waving)
Response #25
By: grin
Date: 2/12/98 11:13:58 PM
i've been made!!!eeek! wave wave wave.
Response #26
By: Gowan McGland
Date: 2/12/98 11:37:05 PM
GRIN!
Response #27
By: grin
Date: 2/13/98 2:12:05 AM
Gowan!! I've been lost without my b-movies guru! Home sweet home.
Response #28
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/13/98 8:06:48 AM
Sayeth Grin:
: i think the matchmaker is rigged.
Nope. It's based on a very complex algorithm involving a bunch of cryptic formulas and imaginary numbers. So who did it pick for ya? Tom Cruise? Fabio? I bet it was that Leonardo Di'Cappucino guy.
Response #29
By: rorschach
Date: 2/13/98 1:58:32 PM
Actually fang, not sure even THAT would help, seems AT&T only keeps the first two segments on the IP address constant, all the rest is random. looks like I'm screwed. but hell go ahead and link the credit report, we could all USE a good laugh....speaking of credit reports.... did ya'll hear that fang's and ralf's old alma mater CSC is being bought?
Response #30
By: grin
Date: 2/13/98 2:34:00 PM
Da Sissop: Nope. It's based on a very complex algorithm involving a bunch of cryptic formulas and imaginary numbers. So who did it pick for ya? Tom Cruise? Fabio? I bet it was that Leonardo Di'Cappucino guy.
It was the handsomest raddest stud muffin you could imagine...but i'm not telling cause he's just so WAY out of my league i'll just embarass myself. it'll be my little secret. I just thought i was being too lucky for it to be true...
Response #31
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/14/98 7:40:46 AM
(unable to type, as my head has swollen to twice it's normal size and it's extremely disorienting) 
Ror: I stand corrected. I just doublechecked, and my "WackyIP" designation only looks at the first *two* chunks of an IP address. So it's even less secure, and should work for ya. Just say the word, and you'll have it bestowed upon ye.
Response #32
By: grin
Date: 2/14/98 2:14:28 PM
Pinata!
Response #33
By: Hijinx
Date: 2/16/98 3:44:44 PM
I'm just happy to be here with all you wonderful people...oh, I don't know any of you yet, well, thanks for inviting me...oh, well, none of you invited me, but someone did...and for a cool $50, I'll give ya the bastards name...OK, so he's a good guy, big ups to my man Misteradio.
Response #34
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/16/98 7:05:43 PM
Hiya, jinx! Welcome!
Any friend of Misteradio who says we're wonderful is a friend of mine.
Response #35
By: Cleotis
Date: 2/16/98 7:57:29 PM
Hee hee.
I think I'm one of the few people who can actually make Hijinx double over in disgust. That is, until I invited him here! Woo hoo! KC's in da Hay-ouse!
Response #36
By: Ralf
Date: 2/16/98 8:04:18 PM
Welcome welcome welcome Hijinx!
Response #37
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 2/16/98 9:54:32 PM
howdy, hijinx!
Response #38
By: sooz
Date: 2/17/98 11:14:45 AM
A big, rousing welcome to Hijinx. I like anyone with a handle that has three letters you can dot right in a row.
Simple things for folks like me, yessir.
Response #39
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 2/17/98 12:40:18 PM
Jay, it's nice to see that somethings NEVER change!
http://www.metahtml.com/apps/zippy/welcome.mhtml
Grin! You have been most missed!
How are you?
Response #40
By: rorschach
Date: 2/17/98 4:40:24 PM
Hola to all these newbies. yeah, cleo aint that bad... til ya get to know him but by then, who gives a shit?
Response #41
By: grin
Date: 2/17/98 5:04:53 PM
Hiya Capt! This gets better everyday! I'm doing great, getting more delirious by the hour. It's grand. How bout you?
Am I considered a newbie? If so, Hiya rorschach.
Response #42
By: Cleotis
Date: 2/17/98 9:01:25 PM
Here in Tennessee, we've got these godawful restaurants called "Krystals". They're like White Castles, only the meat and the buns are steamed. Kinda like a beef version of boiled okra. They're slimy, greasy, and disgusting.
And Hijinx used to eat them by the sackfull.
I have to tell you, I was thankful that he was the one coming in after ME at the radio station, instead of the other way around. The control room can get mighty small very quickly when the farts are that potent!
Response #43
By: sooz
Date: 2/17/98 11:31:31 PM
(Reminder to self: 1. Steer clear of Krystal's when passing through TN. 2. Go to Graceland instead.
Response #44
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 2/18/98 3:07:19 AM
If you didn't go to Krystal, then you missed The Real Tennessee. You also have to go to Opryland and the big pyramid in Memphis.
Response #45
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 2/18/98 5:03:17 AM
Cleotis:
So the difference is steamed buns...well I, for one, am all for steamed buns.
Response #46
By: Da Sissop
Date: 2/18/98 7:18:16 AM
They gots Krystals in Atlanta, too, and I was quite fond of them. I also thought it was hilarious that the two-, three-, and four-dollar value meals consisted of a drink, fries, and two, four, or six burgers, respectively.
"Uh oh, Clem, better boil up a shitload of burger-wafers! That Porter guy is back!"
Response #47
By: rorschach
Date: 2/18/98 4:18:17 PM
they had em in mississippi too... use to eat them things comin and going course I was only 5 at the time so what did I know....
Response #48
By: Cleotis
Date: 2/22/98 11:31:40 AM
I think they key word in eating Krystals "coming and going" is GOING.
Response #49
By: Tess Trueheart
Date: 2/28/98 10:22:28 AM
JJ sez..Ah yes.. I remember you. You're the real estate lady with the eye level breasts.
As I've often been told..when your nose to nose your toes are in it.. and when your toe to toe your nose is in it..
For some reason I aways found that comforting..
Response #50
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 3/1/98 7:13:57 AM
LOL! ...errr...huh?
Response #51
By: Hijinx
Date: 3/2/98 11:52:49 PM
OK...so, I signed up and never came back to get my ID card made, well, OK, here I am and now I see that you fine people (at least one of ya) has been talking 'bout me...Screw any one who ain't listenin' to the Krystal (its their ad campaign-sorry if you don't get it). Cleotis, God bless your little, pointed head...and a big HEY HEY HEY to all the folks in the nunnery that took the time to say Hi...
Response #52
By: Ralf
Date: 3/3/98 8:33:29 PM
Welcome back 'jinx. Stay away from ZipperHed; he likes to spank.
Response #53
By: sooz
Date: 3/3/98 9:21:35 PM
I wish there were a command on Nuns similar to what the search engines use... like, I could ask for read all, -spank.
Response #54
By: Hijinx
Date: 3/4/98 4:03:11 PM
Hey Thanks, Ralf...I am a sorry-ass newbie, but you guys gotta love me.
Response #55
By: rorschach
Date: 3/4/98 5:10:16 PM
figuratively speaking of course....
Response #56
By: Cleotis
Date: 3/4/98 9:31:34 PM
I know Hijinx. I also know first hand that he loves "spanking". In fact, he doesn't know this, but I caught him doing it one time when I came into work unexpectedly.
Pitiful...
Response #57
By: jjhitt
Date: 3/5/98 1:35:06 AM
Tess sez:
> As I've often been told..when your nose to
> nose your toes are in it.. and when your toe
> to toe your nose is in it..
I like that!
Cant remember it worth a damn, but I like it.
But then, that's what I like about it. It's prone to being
messed up and the messes may be as much fun as the way it's
'sposed' to be.
Response #58
By: rorschach
Date: 3/5/98 7:57:23 PM
here's something that might fall under the original thread... i have noticed that the system doesn't keep track of the TIME of the last visit, merely the last date... so if you check back later in the day, you end up re-reading the stuff you read earlier... don't get me wrong, sometimes what with the topic shear that happens here that is a help... but sometimes its just boring....
Response #59
By: Ralf
Date: 3/5/98 8:29:45 PM
Heh... "topic shear". Pretty descriptive.
Sooz: Yeah! YEAH!! I'd LOVE a search-engine thingie for WebNuns.
Heck, I'd just like to see a count of how often the word "spank" appears.
Response #60
By: Hijinx
Date: 3/5/98 9:57:19 PM
in that case...here's a few more...
SPanK!!SpaNk!!!Spank!spaNk!!sPAnk!!!
Response #61
By: Cleotis
Date: 3/5/98 10:47:54 PM
I kind of like the fact that the nunnery keeps track of the last DAY you called. It helps me backtrack the thread a little bit to see what exactly I responded TO.
Response #62
By: Da Sissop
Date: 3/6/98 7:36:14 AM
It was a conscious decision on my part, for that very reason. But it's a simple matter of preference. I *could* make it compare dates up-to-the-minute by twiddling just a few bytes of code, and if I ever get around to implementing some sort of customizable "User Preferences" dealie, that will probably be one of the settings you could twiddle for yourself.
Response #63
By: rorschach
Date: 3/7/98 6:14:25 AM
if you do get around to doing that, here's a third suggestion that many people might like, instead of all messages with the same date, how about any message within 24 hours of the current time/date, sort of a mini-ld. that way you back up enough to follow the thread but you don't keep reading as many old messages if you call back less than 24 hours later, the window moves with you. or even better make the number of hours a variable that the user can twiddle.
Response #64
By: sooz
Date: 3/7/98 8:58:13 PM
I like Ror*s 24-hour idea. I don't know if it's possible or not, but it's cool. Or maybe 48 hours, because some threads don't get daily posts, ya know?
Response #65
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 3/8/98 6:47:47 AM
Maybe a minimum of the last three replies, if any of them happened in the 48 hours before the LD date. Or two years or 50,000 miles, whichever comes first.
Response #66
By: Zipperhead
Date: 3/11/98 7:47:23 PM
Spanking seems to have caught on.
Response #67
By: Cleotis
Date: 3/11/98 9:42:30 PM
Spanking is the second oldest profession.
Response #68
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 3/13/98 7:55:34 AM
Da sissop sez: It was a conscious decision on my part, for that very reason. But it's a simple matter of preference. I *could* make it compare dates up-to-the-minute by twiddling just a few bytes of code, and if I ever get around to implementing some sort of customizable "User Preferences" dealie, that will probably be one of the settings you could twiddle for yourself. ==============================
Zane pulls up on a Gumby-Green Harley wearing a Radio Shack Flashing-Hazard Light Helmet and leather swimming trunks..."I'm sorry sir, I was going to let you slide with the repetative use of the word 'twiddle' in this post....but that 'twiddle for yourself' stuff...I'm going to have to give you a ticket..." Zane activates a button and a basketball hoop unfolds from the left saddlebag..."...but if you get three baskets in a row you'll make enough to trade in and get this lovely plastic frog collection! Perfect for spanking."
Response #69
By: Zane T. Dark
Date: 3/15/98 9:45:58 AM
What?! None of you have played Skee-Ball? That's unAmerican!!!
Response #70
By: Da Sissop
Date: 3/15/98 10:28:51 AM
I'm just miffed that it's not in the Olympics.
Response #71
By: Zipperhead
Date: 3/17/98 10:51:02 AM
Skee-Ball Rocks!!!!! Right along side of Wac A Mole
Response #72
By: Kathy
Date: 3/19/98 10:13:02 PM
I had a happy childhood.
Response #73
By: Da Sissop
Date: 3/20/98 7:02:58 AM
I used to *love* Whack-A-Mole, but eventually my parents stopped buying me hamsters.
Response #74
By: Jay
Date: 3/23/98 1:54:29 PM
My parents misunderstood the concept and bought me a dermatology set
Response #75
By: Da Sissop
Date: 3/23/98 10:01:16 PM
Whack-a-Pimple was fun too, but the prizes were usually disappointing.
Response #76
By: Cleotis
Date: 3/25/98 12:47:38 AM
Somehow, "whacking" and adolescence just seem to naturally go together.
Response #77
By: Zipperhead
Date: 3/25/98 10:29:42 AM
Kathy Your still a child.
Response #78
By: Kathy
Date: 3/28/98 1:07:48 PM
No.... I'm a "young lady."
Response #79
By: Jay
Date: 3/30/98 11:28:43 AM
...I used to be juvenile, but now that I'm over 30 I'm just emotionally stunted...
Response #80
By: Zipperhead
Date: 3/31/98 1:29:59 PM
Actually Kathy you are a "Boyfriendless" TWIT
Response #81
By: sooz
Date: 3/31/98 5:40:13 PM
Well, THAT was nice. Hmph.
Response #82
By: Ralf
Date: 3/31/98 6:27:22 PM
Somebody needs a nap, sounds like.
Response #83
By: Kathy
Date: 4/1/98 8:49:46 PM
It really makes you wonder how I turned out to be so nice, doesn't it?
I got it all from my mother, I assure you.
Response #84
By: Zipperhead
Date: 4/7/98 9:10:57 AM
Thats it Kathleen Ann.....No more free Food!!!!!
Response #85
By: Mycroft
Date: 4/8/98 5:54:31 PM
I know somebody who's going to have all the taco-bell toys soon...
Response #86
By: Homer The Brave
Date: 6/14/98 4:15:15 AM
Well, this *is* the suggestion thread, and while these aren't actual suggestions, they fit into the 'ask the admin' category.
1) When I've used images in my posts, I've always pointed to an external http server. Then when I edit those posts later, they've miraculously moved to the nunz server. Does that happen automatically? And where can I ftp to put the file on nunz in the first place?
2) <P> has a closing tag, </P>. Not a suggestion, just a factoid. :-)
3) HTML has a nifty thing called <DIV>. It's a super handy tag. Could the nunz support it PLEEEZE? (this *is* a suggestion, I suppose.)
4) There is no item 4.
5) Is there such a thing as nun documentation? Aside from the catechism... I'll help write/html-ify it, if need be.
Response #87
By: Da Sissop
Date: 6/14/98 7:32:37 PM
1.) It does not happen automatically. Usually either elves or myself will save a copy of the source image here locally and edit the messages so that they refer to the local copy. This is primarily because I, myself, have experienced horrendous lag when reading a 100-response thread, with an image on another server referenced in message #50, and that server is temporarily down or unreachable. So I figure, to minimize this, I'll just copy the source image to my own server.
Currently there is no ftp or other means of uploading. And that's largely because it's one of those issues I keep reshuffling to the bottom of the priority pile. If it's really *easy* to upload 1.5 megabyte .bmp files of your blurry cat and embed them in your messages, I fear the overall Nunnery performance could suffer. I'd *like* to allow uploads, and to make it easy to be as creative as ya wanna be, but I don't yet know how to do it with safeguards.
So, until I *do* get the devil outta the damn details, you could either e-mail me images you'd like to post, or do your linkin' to other sites like you have been.
2.) :P
3.) I'll look into DIV.
4.) This item has already been fixed.
5.) No actual docs, but there is a FAQ in the works.
Response #88
By: Ralf
Date: 6/17/98 7:27:56 AM
You could write an automatic thingie that scans the board looking for external HTTP: references, then copies the relevant files locally.
Run it as a nightly batch process.
Response #89
By: Zipperhead
Date: 6/17/98 10:56:23 AM
Ralf, will you be on call if it abends?
Response #90
By: Capt. Spastic
Date: 6/17/98 6:04:31 PM
What would be the point of it running NIGHTLY if it's an HTML tage in a message?
Response #91
By: Da Sissop
Date: 6/17/98 9:37:45 PM
No, see, I could have a process that *scans* messages for image tags that don't refer to images on my local machine, and then, when it finds 'em, copies 'em over to my local machine, and then updates the message so that it *does* point to my local machine...
It should be in beta testing by October.
Response #92
By: Ralf
Date: 6/17/98 9:48:01 PM
God, I love this man. He reads my mind, figures out EXACTLY what I want, and then makes me wait for it.
I feel so... teased.
Response #93
By: rorschach
Date: 6/18/98 8:50:04 PM
he's been taking lessons from Ol' Bill himself....
Response #94
By: Seventh of Seven
Date: 10/13/98 10:21:51 PM
btw fang, can i say how impressed i am with this board? it's just like the weasel--did you make this all yourself??
btw for anyone who knows me and is curious what i've been up to, you may find my webpage enlightening. hi all!
Response #95
By: Da Sissop
Date: 10/14/98 5:42:49 PM
Thankya, yes I did, using completely outdated Win-CGI technology.
Response #96
By: rorschach
Date: 10/15/98 6:55:27 PM
no technology is obsolete as long as it still does the job it was intended to do.
Response #97
By: Cleotis
Date: 10/18/98 10:00:51 AM
Sez Rorschach, who still uses a 16-bit version of NutScrape.
Response #98
By: Seventh of Seven
Date: 10/18/98 1:54:28 PM
Here's a honest to god suggestion:
The similarity to weaselnet and your win-cgi thing (do you have a name for it?) is super scary. Weasel also had that thing where it would only understand it if you typed two enters like this:
and not one, in which case it would not go down a line (something to do with line feeds, i think). Now that you're using HTML, why not allow an enter typed to mean an enter displayed? Instead of translating each two sequential enters as a <P>, why not translate each enter as a <br>?
Response #99
By: Da Sissop
Date: 10/18/98 5:15:55 PM
Well well, mister smartguy, I'll TELL you why...
Okay, I don't remember why, but I'm sure I had a good reason.
Response #100
By: Gowan McGland
Date: 10/18/98 6:05:40 PM
Hey, what happened to my nifty search engine idea?
Response #101
By: Da Sissop
Date: 10/18/98 6:14:44 PM
What nifty search engine idea? I don't think you ever asked me for any nifty search engines. If you did, I'd appreciate if you'd show me the message.
Response #102
By: Seventh of Seven
Date: 10/18/98 8:11:44 PM
woohoo! gowan, i believe we've stumped the sissop.
Response #103
By: Ralf
Date: 10/19/98 7:31:44 AM
I'd do a search for it, but your crappy software DOESN'T HAVE A SEARCH function!
I pay $49 a month for this? I want my money back.
Response #104
By: Ralf
Date: 10/20/98 9:37:37 AM
By the way, the new search function is REALLY NEATO.
59 occurences of "pants". Whoops, make that 60.
Response #105
By: Da Sissop
Date: 10/20/98 2:38:56 PM
Thanks! Oh, and you're late with October's $49.00.
Response #106
By: Ralf
Date: 10/21/98 7:48:14 PM
Damn. Pay you with sex again?